









|
 |
 |
|
DONALD P.
JACOBS
djacobs@budd-larner.com
973-315-4413
Don
practices in the areas of appeals, Internet law, §1983 defense,
marketing law, ERISA appeals and litigation.
|
Appeals
Don prepares
appellate briefs and presents oral argument in a variety of areas, including
employment discrimination, intellectual property, RICO, §1983 civil rights
and consumer fraud. He was on the brief in Beck v. Prupis, a RICO
case decided by the United States Supreme Court, and has argued many times
before the New Jersey Supreme Court, the United States Court of Appeals
for the Third Circuit, the Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division,
and other appellate courts. He is a former adjunct professor at Rutgers
Law School, where he taught "Effective Legal Writing."
Among
the cases in which Don wrote briefs and presented oral argument are the
following:
- Wingmaster Plus, Inc. v. Meserlian, No. A-2144-04T3 (App. Div. 2006). The New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division, reversed a judgment entered after a jury trial and held that defendants were entitled to judgment on plaintiff's claims of trademark infringement, counterfeiting and unfair competition under the Lanham Act and on plaintiff's claim of unfair competition under state law.
Click here for Unpublished Decision
- Rosen Associates
Management Corp. v. Bruckner Plaza Associates, 743 N.Y.S.2d 282
(N.Y.A.D. 2d Dept. 2002). The New York Appellate Division, Second Department,
affirmed a judgment in favor of defendants in an action for brokerage
commissions and other damages.
- Mogull v.
CB Commercial Real Estate Group, Inc., 319 N.J. Super. 53 (App.
Div. 1999), rev'd in part and remanded in part, 162 N.J. 449
(2000), rev'd and remanded as to punitive damages, No. A-4501-96T1
(App. Div. 2000), certif. denied, 165 N.J. 607 (2000). The
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division, reversed a $5 million
punitive damage award against an employer in a sex discrimination
case arising under the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination. Click here for Unpublished Decision
- Shovlin v.
University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, No. 98-6346
(3d Cir. 1999). The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
affirmed summary judgment in favor of a university official in a §1983
civil rights action involving alleged violations of First Amendment
rights.
- General Motors
Corp. v. City of Linden, 143 N.J. 336, cert. denied, 519
U.S. 816 (1996). The New Jersey Supreme Court held that General Motors
could not maintain a §1983 action against a city and its tax assessor
for allegedly unconstitutional tax assessments.
§1983
Defense
Don represents
public entities and public officials in the defense of actions filed under
42 U.S.C. §1983, a federal statute that permits recovery for violations
of constitutional rights. Don has prepared motions to dismiss and motions
for summary judgment in such cases, has presented oral argument in state
and federal court, and has negotiated settlements. He is the author of
"Responding
to Novel Claims Under §1983: An Aggressive Defense Strategy."
Marketing
Law
For clients
in the direct mail industry, Don reviews promotions for compliance with
applicable law, responds to problems that arise with the US Postal Service
and state attorneys general, and handles litigation. Besides selling merchandise,
Dons clients have offered sweepstakes, telephone trivia games and
puzzle contests.
Don
reviews Internet promotions for compliance with applicable law, writes
sweepstakes rules and terms and conditions to effectuate client concepts,
drafts and negotiates contracts, and addresses privacy, trademark, copyright,
customer service and other issues.
ERISA Appeals and Litigation
The intricate statutory and regulatory scheme governing ERISA-regulated benefits plans can be daunting to the uninitiated employee, beneficiary or attorney. Don has thoroughly researched and written about the Department of Labor regulation that permits appeals from denials of benefits. He is experienced in preparing ERISA appeals and in challenging denials of such appeals in federal court, paying particular attention to the consequences of any non-compliance with the applicable procedural regulation.
General
Litigation
Don handles
commercial litigation matters involving RICO, trademarks, discrimination,
contracts and other issues. He is experienced in writing briefs at all
stages of trial court litigation. For example, in Jazz Photo Corp.
v. Imation Corp. -- a federal case in which Budd Larner's client obtained
a settlement of more than $26 million -- Don wrote or oversaw the preparation
of more than 30 briefs, addressing discovery, summary judgment, evidentiary
and appellate issues. See also Good 'N Natural v. Nature's Bounty,
Inc., 1990 WL 127126 (D.N.J. 1990) (granting summary judgment to defendant
in trademark infringement action under Lanham Act).
EDUCATION:
Undergraduate:
Cornell University (B.S. 1973)
Law School: Rutgers Law School (J.D. 1981)
BAR
ADMISSIONS:
- United States
Supreme Court
- New Jersey, New
York and Pennsylvania
- United States
Courts of Appeals for the Third, Seventh, Eighth and Ninth Circuits
- United States
District Courts for the Southern District of New York, New Jersey,
and Eastern District of Pennsylvania
- US Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
PROFESSIONAL
PROFILE:
- Member, New Jersey
State Bar Association; The Association of the Federal Bar of the State
of New Jersey; Direct Marketing Club of New York; Appellate Practice Committee of the New Jersey State
Bar Association
- Former mediator,
Community Dispute Resolution Project
- Managing Editor,
Rutgers Law Journal, 1980-81
- Former Senior
Editor, Labor Relations Guide
- Certificate of
Merit, American Bar Association, Gavel Awards program
- Member, Federal
Circuit Bar Association
Return
to Attorney Profiles Index
Home
/ What's New / Firm
Profile / Practice Areas / Attorneys
Publications
/ Recruiting
/ Search / Contact Us
/ Budd
International
© 2007 Budd Larner, All Rights Reserved

|
|